|
2010 Offensive
Line Rankings and Analysis
The following offensive line rankings were determined
based on a number of factors which include the new additions to the
offensive line, injuries suffered last season, the durability of the
line, the average age of the line and the depth of the line. The
offensive lines have been divided in six groups and teams in each group are listed in
alphabetical order. To further understand each line, click on the team name and it
will lead you to a detailed analysis of the offensive line.
See our 2009 Offensive Line Rankings
and Analysis
See
how
our rankings fared in 2009
Based on averages from the past two years, here is how
we did in the "Improvement if healthy" column:
|
Run Blocking |
Number |
YPC Diff |
|
Better |
13 |
+0.29 |
|
Slightly Better |
20 |
+0.16 |
|
Same |
25 |
+0.06 |
|
Slightly Worse & Worse |
6 |
-0.48 |
|
Pass Blocking |
Number |
Sacks Diff |
|
Better |
11 |
-10.6 |
|
Slightly Better |
15 |
-3.3 |
|
Same |
33 |
+4.8 |
|
Slightly Worse & Worse |
5 |
+1.2 |
Excellent
|
|
2009 |
Starters |
Improvement if healthy |
|
|
|
Team |
YPC |
Sacks |
Avg. Age |
30 & over |
Run Blocking |
Pass Blocking |
Durability |
Depth |
|
New Orleans Saints |
4.5 |
20 |
28.0 |
2 |
Same |
Same |
Very Good |
Good |
|
|
All 5 starters back, pretty good depth; no reason why they can't
be as good as last year. |
|
Tennessee Titans |
5.2 |
15 |
27.6 |
0 |
Slightly Worse |
Slightly Worse |
Very Good |
Poor |
|
|
Loss of Mawae could hurt early in the year but should be just as
good in 2nd half; depth is a huge concern. |
Very Good
|
|
2009 |
Starters |
Improvement if healthy |
|
|
|
Team |
YPC |
Sacks |
Avg. Age |
30 & over |
Run Blocking |
Pass Blocking |
Durability |
Depth |
|
Atlanta Falcons |
4.2 |
27 |
28.2 |
1 |
Slightly Better |
Better |
Good |
Mediocre |
|
|
All 5 starters back but injuries hurt a lot last year; should be
very similar to 2008. |
|
Arizona Cardinals |
4.1 |
26 |
27.4-28.6 |
1 - 2 |
Better |
Slightly Worse |
Very Good |
Very Good |
|
|
Upgraded its two weakest linemen and have 2 good backups; loss
of Warner will increase number of sacks. |
|
Baltimore Ravens |
4.7 |
36 |
26.6 - 27.2 |
1 |
Slightly Better |
Same |
Good |
Good |
|
|
4-5 starters back, safe bet to be very much like last year;
running game could be improved with Yanda. |
|
New England Patriots |
4.1 |
18 |
30.4 |
4 |
Same |
Same |
Fair |
Good |
|
|
2 all-star tackles; 2 good players battling for 3 spots inside;
won't be much better than last year but very safe. |
|
San Francisco 49ers |
4.3 |
40 |
24.8 |
0 |
Slightly Better |
Slightly Better |
Good |
Very Good |
|
|
2 first round picks will upgrade this line; 3 backups capable of
starting; excellent upside and very safe. |
Good
|
|
2009 |
Starters |
Improvement if healthy |
|
|
|
Team |
YPC |
Sacks |
Avg. Age |
30 & over |
Run Blocking |
Pass Blocking |
Durability |
Depth |
|
Carolina Panthers |
4.8 |
33 |
26.4 |
1 |
Slightly Worse |
Slightly Better |
Fair |
Fair |
|
|
Minor change at right guard; should be very similar to last year
but depth and durability are a concern. |
|
Cincinnati Bengals |
4.1 |
29 |
27.8 |
1 |
Same |
Slightly Better |
Good |
Very Good |
|
|
Everyone who played last year will be back but 2009 1st rounder
Andre Smith should be an upgrade at RT. |
|
Cleveland Browns |
4.1 |
30 |
28.0 |
3 |
Slightly Better |
Slightly Better |
Fair |
Good |
|
|
Left side of the line is all back, Pashos will be an upgrade at
RT and Delhomme will make the line look better. |
|
Miami Dolphins |
4.4 |
34 |
26.6 - 27.4 |
1 |
Slightly Better |
Same |
Good |
Very Good |
|
|
2 all-star tackles; 2 good players battling for 3 spots inside;
won't be much better than last year but very safe. |
|
New York Jets |
4.5 |
30 |
27.2 |
1 |
Slightly Better |
Same |
Very Good |
Poor |
|
|
2 all-star tackles; 2 good players battling for 3 spots inside;
won't be much better than last year but very safe. |
|
St. Louis Rams |
4.3 |
44 |
25.4 - 26.4 |
0 - 1 |
Slightly Better |
Better |
Fair |
Good |
|
|
4.5 YPC and 29 sacks in 13 games with Bell; Smith is an upgrade
at LT; could surprise if healthy. |
Fair
|
|
2009 |
Starters |
Improvement if healthy |
|
|
|
Team |
YPC |
Sacks |
Avg. Age |
30 & over |
Run Blocking |
Pass Blocking |
Durability |
Depth |
|
Indianapolis Colts |
3.5 |
13 |
27.8 - 28.6 |
2 |
Slightly Better |
Same |
Good |
Very Good |
|
|
4 starters back from 2nd half, 13 sacks will be hard to match
but running game should be a little better. |
|
Jacksonville Jaguars |
4.5 |
44 |
26.2 - 27.2 |
1 - 2 |
Same |
Better |
Fair |
Good |
|
|
All 5 starters are back on the roster but Smiley could steal one
of those jobs inside; no good backup at tackle. |
|
Kansas City Chiefs |
4.4 |
45 |
28.0 - 30.0 |
1 - 2 |
Slightly Better |
Better |
Fair |
Mediocre |
|
|
This line looked very good in the 2nd half and 4 starters are
back but not sure if they can keep it up. |
|
New York Giants |
4.1 |
32 |
30.4 |
3 |
Slightly Better |
Slightly Better |
Good |
Fair |
|
|
5 starters back, 4.3 YPC and 15 sacks in 10 full games with
starters last year; should be similar to that in 2010. |
|
Seattle Seahawks |
4.0 |
41 |
27.2 |
1 |
Better |
Slightly Better |
Fair |
Good |
|
|
Okung will be a nice upgrade at LT; one good versatile backup;
new zone blocking scheme should help. |
Mediocre
|
|
2009 |
Starters |
Improvement if healthy |
|
|
|
Team |
YPC |
Sacks |
Avg. Age |
30 & over |
Run Blocking |
Pass Blocking |
Durability |
Depth |
|
Dallas Cowboys |
4.8 |
34 |
30.2 |
4 |
Slightly Worse |
Slightly Worse |
Good |
Good |
|
|
4 starters back, should still be very good in run blocking but
have to be concerned with 4 linemen 31 or older. |
|
Denver Broncos |
4.2 |
34 |
24.2 - 26.0 |
0 - 1 |
Slightly Better |
Same |
Fair |
Good |
|
|
Pass protection will be slightly better than last year if Clady
is healthy, otherwise it'll be quite worse. |
|
Green Bay Packers |
4.3 |
51 |
28.0 -29.6 |
2 |
Slightly Worse |
Better |
Fair |
Very Good |
|
|
All 5 starters from the final 7 games will be on roster, if
changes are made it will be for the better. |
|
Houston Texans |
3.5 |
25 |
25.8 |
0 |
Better |
Same |
Very Good |
Good |
|
|
All 5 starters from 2nd half of season will be back but they are
very young and should improve. |
|
Minnesota Vikings |
4.1 |
34 |
28.2 |
3 |
Same |
Same |
Good |
Fair |
|
|
5 starters back, should play pretty much like they did last
year. |
|
Philadelphia Eagles |
4.3 |
38 |
27.0 - 27.2 |
0 - 1 |
Same |
Slightly Better |
Good |
Fair |
|
|
Jackson will miss a good portion of the season; the length of
his absence will determine how this line does. |
|
Washington Redskins |
3.9 |
46 |
28.4 |
2 |
Better |
Better |
Good |
Good |
|
|
3 upgrades compared to last year; one of the most improved
o-lines in the NFL. |
Poor
|
|
2009 |
Starters |
Improvement if healthy |
|
|
|
Team |
YPC |
Sacks |
Avg. Age |
30 & over |
Run Blocking |
Pass Blocking |
Durability |
Depth |
|
Buffalo Bills |
4.4 |
46 |
27.2 |
1 |
Same |
Slightly Better |
Fair |
Mediocre |
|
|
Very weak at tackle and no depth inside; running game will be
solid again but everyone must stay healthy. |
|
Chicago Bears |
4.0 |
35 |
28.6 - 29.2 |
2 - 3 |
Same |
Same |
Good |
Fair |
|
|
Line will be very similar to last year except for a few minor
changes, will have one good backup. |
|
Detroit Lions |
4.0 |
43 |
28.6 |
2 |
Slightly Better |
Slightly Better |
Fair |
Mediocre |
|
|
4 starters back, Sims will be a big improvement at LG but
everyone needs to stay healthy. |
|
Oakland Raiders |
4.1 |
49 |
26.4 - 28.2 |
2 - 3 |
Slightly Better |
Slightly Better |
Good |
Good |
|
|
Return of Gallery will help; much more depth than last year but
starters don't seem any better. |
|
Pittsburgh Steelers |
4.2 |
50 |
26.8 |
1 |
Same |
Same |
Good |
Mediocre |
|
|
1st round pick Pouncey will be an upgrade at RG but injury to
Colon hurts even more; need to sign another RT. |
|
San Diego Chargers |
3.3 |
26 |
26.4 - 28.2 |
0 - 1 |
Better |
Slightly Worse |
Fair |
Very Good |
|
|
Pass protection will be same as last year if LT McNeill signs,
otherwise it'll be quite worse. |
|
Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
4.0 |
33 |
26.6 |
0 |
Slightly Better |
Slightly Worse |
Good |
Poor |
|
|
All 5 starters back, little depth, Penn still unsigned.
Shouldn't be much different than last year. |
|