|
2009 Offensive
Line Rankings and Analysis
The following offensive line rankings were determined based on a number of
factors which include the new additions to the offensive line, injuries suffered last
season, the durability of the line, the average age of the line and the depth of the line.
The offensive lines have been divided in five groups and teams in each group are listed in
alphabetical order. To further understand each line, click on the team name and it
will lead you to a detailed analysis of the offensive line.
Discuss these rankings in our forums
See our
2008 Offensive Line Rankings
and Analysis
Very Good
|
|
2008 |
Starters |
Improvement if healthy |
|
|
|
Team |
YPC |
Sacks |
Avg. Age |
30 & over |
Run Blocking |
Pass Blocking |
Durability |
Depth |
|
Atlanta Falcons |
4.4 |
17 |
27.8 |
1 |
Same |
Same |
Good |
Fair |
|
|
All 5 starters back but will struggle if
1 or 2 linemen go down. |
|
Carolina Panthers |
4.8 |
20 |
27 |
1 |
Slightly Better |
Same |
Mediocre |
Poor |
|
|
All 5 starters back but as LT Jordan
Gross said: "As it sits now, we can't really afford to have
anybody get hurt" |
|
Denver Broncos |
4.8 |
12 |
28.4 |
2 |
Slightly Worse |
Slightly Worse |
Good |
Mediocre |
|
|
All 5 starters back but probably won't perform as well under
new offensive scheme. |
|
New Orleans Saints |
4 |
13 |
28.2 |
2 |
Slightly Better |
Same |
Good |
Very Good |
|
|
All 5 starters back; not the best starting 5 but 3 good
backups. |
|
New York Giants |
5 |
28 |
29.6 |
3 |
Same |
Same |
Good |
Fair |
|
|
All 5 starters back and should be as good as last season;
McKenzie's back is the only concern. |
|
Philadelphia Eagles |
4 |
23 |
27.6 |
0 |
Better |
Same |
Good |
Good |
|
|
Added Pro Bowler Peters, will once again be one of the best
in run blocking. |
|
Tennessee Titans |
4.3 |
12 |
29.4 |
1 |
Same |
Same |
Very Good |
Mediocre |
|
|
All 5 starters back, four of whom are 28 or under. Line
might be slightly worse if 38-year old Mawae is hurt. |
Good
|
|
2008 |
Starters |
Improvement if healthy |
|
|
|
Team |
YPC |
Sacks |
Avg. Age |
30 & over |
Run Blocking |
Pass Blocking |
Durability |
Depth |
|
Chicago Bears |
3.9 |
29 |
29.2 - 30.4 |
3 |
Slightly Better |
Better |
Fair |
Very Good |
|
|
If Pace stays healthy this line will be one of the best in
pass protection but still average in run blocking. |
|
Cleveland Browns |
3.9 |
24 |
26.8 - 28.8 |
0 - 2 |
Better |
Same |
Fair |
Very Good |
|
|
3 starters back; at least 1 upgrade; a healthy Steinbach
should be a big boost for this running game. |
|
Jacksonville Jaguars |
4.2 |
42 |
27.0 - 29.6 |
2 - 3 |
Better |
Better |
Poor |
Very Good |
|
|
Better and with much more depth than last year. Even in the
worst case scenario, they'll improve over 2008. |
|
Kansas City Chiefs |
4.8 |
37 |
29.8 |
3 |
Same |
Same |
Fair |
Good |
|
|
4 starters back and one upgrade but Pro Bowler Waters is
unhappy and 3 starters are at least 32 years old. |
|
Miami Dolphins |
4.2 |
26 |
26.6 - 27.2 |
0 |
Slightly Better |
Slightly Better |
Fair |
Fair |
|
|
Should be slightly better at C and; a lot of depth inside
but need Long and Carey to play 16 games. |
|
New England Patriots |
4.4 |
48 |
30.2 |
4 |
Same |
Better |
Fair |
Good |
|
|
All 5 starters back but Brady will help decrease the sack
total; much more depth than in previous years. |
|
New York Jets |
4.7 |
30 |
29 |
2 |
Same |
Same |
Very Good |
Mediocre |
|
|
All 5 starters back but they need to stay healthy or the
offense will struggle. |
Fair
|
|
2008 |
Starters |
Improvement if healthy |
|
|
|
Team |
YPC |
Sacks |
Avg. Age |
30 & over |
Run Blocking |
Pass Blocking |
Durability |
Depth |
|
Baltimore Ravens |
4 |
33 |
25.8 - 26.0 |
1 |
Slightly Better |
Slightly Better |
Good |
Good |
|
|
Four very young starters, three returning from last year,
with the veteran 6-time Pro Bowler Matt Birk at center. |
|
Buffalo Bills |
4.2 |
38 |
25.8 |
1 |
Same |
Better |
Very Good |
Fair |
|
|
Brand new line, no great talent but all five are hard
workers and very smart. This line will surprise many in
2009. |
|
Green Bay Packers |
4.1 |
34 |
26.8 - 28.0 |
1 |
Better |
Same |
Good |
Good |
|
|
3 or 4 of the starters will be back but a lot of young
linemen who could surprise; no irreplaceable starter. |
|
Houston Texans |
4.3 |
32 |
26.8 |
1 |
Same |
Slightly Better |
Very Good |
Fair |
|
|
All 5 starters back and working with Alex Gibbs. No backups
with experience but no irreplaceable starter. |
|
Indianapolis Colts |
3.4 |
14 |
28.4 |
2 |
Better |
Same |
Poor |
Good |
|
|
This line will be one of the best if Ugoh, Lilja and
Saturday stay healthy all year but that's a pretty big if. |
|
Oakland Raiders |
4.3 |
39 |
27.6 - 29.2 |
1 - 2 |
Same |
Slightly Better |
Good |
Very Good |
|
|
3 starters back, downgrade at C but upgrade at T; 4 backups
with NFL experience |
|
San Diego Chargers |
4.1 |
25 |
26.0 - 27.8 |
0 - 1 |
Slightly Better |
Same |
Fair |
Mediocre |
|
|
4 starters back and all 4 are young but RG is a concern;
McNeill, Dielman and Hardwick must stay healthy |
|
Seattle Seahawks |
4.2 |
36 |
27.8 |
1 - 2 |
Slightly Better |
Slightly Better |
Poor |
Very Good |
|
|
All 5 starters missed at least 2 games this year, all 5 are
back this year; can only improve. |
Mediocre
|
|
2008 |
Starters |
Improvement if healthy |
|
|
|
Team |
YPC |
Sacks |
Avg. Age |
30 & over |
Run Blocking |
Pass Blocking |
Durability |
Depth |
|
Cincinnati Bengals |
3.6 |
51 |
27.2 |
1 |
Better |
Better |
Fair |
Good |
|
|
Only 2 starters back, only 1 at the same position. Lots of
changes but this line could surprise this year. |
|
Dallas Cowboys |
4.3 |
31 |
31.6 |
5 |
Same |
Same |
Good |
Mediocre |
|
|
All 5 starters back but they're old and pass protection
could become a problem. |
|
Minnesota Vikings |
4.5 |
43 |
27.6 |
2 |
Slightly Worse |
Slightly Worse |
Very Good |
Very Good |
|
|
Replacing Pro Bowler Birk with Sullivan will hurt; 2
versatile backups with experience; transition year for this
line. |
|
San Francisco 49ers |
4 |
55 |
27.2 |
1 |
Slightly Better |
Better |
Fair |
Fair |
|
|
Things can only be better with Marvel Smith at RT; will be
much improved in pass protection. |
|
St. Louis Rams |
4 |
45 |
26 |
0 |
Better |
Slightly Better |
Fair |
Mediocre |
|
|
So many injuries last season that they should improve
despite the loss of Pace. |
|
Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
4.1 |
32 |
26.2 |
0 |
Same |
Same |
Good |
Good |
|
|
All 5 starters back and all very young but haven't shown as
much improvement as we'd expect. |
|
Washington Redskins |
4.4 |
38 |
30.2 |
0 |
Slightly Worse |
Slightly Better |
Fair |
Mediocre |
|
|
Made two changes, should be about as good if Samuels and
Thomas stay healthy but very little depth. |
Poor
|
|
2008 |
Starters |
Improvement if healthy |
|
|
|
Team |
YPC |
Sacks |
Avg. Age |
30 & over |
Run Blocking |
Pass Blocking |
Durability |
Depth |
|
Arizona Cardinals |
3.5 |
28 |
27 |
1 |
Same |
Same |
Very Good |
Fair |
|
|
5 starters back, will still struggle in run blocking but
should be pretty good in pass protection. |
|
Detroit Lions |
3.8 |
52 |
28.4 |
2 |
Same |
Better |
Good |
Fair |
|
|
One of the worst o-lines in 2008; 4 of the 5 starters are
back but many were hurt so could be a little better. |
|
Pittsburgh Steelers |
3.7 |
49 |
26.8 |
1 |
Same |
Slightly Better |
Good |
Poor |
|
|
5 starters back from last 11 games last season; will
struggle again. |
|