Weekly Consistency
The idea for this article came from
FFToday, a site well-known for its
Crank Scores. “Crank Scores rank the consistency of a
player (Crank = Consistency-Rank). Crank Scores is a concept
designed to help identify players that consistently give the best
performance on a weekly basis in head-to-head leagues.” I noticed
they explained why they prefer to have consistent players on their
team but without backing it up with any statistics.
I also noticed that quarterbacks and running
backs are much more consistent than wide receivers so following that
theory, a top QB or RB would have more value than a top WR because
odds are that the top QB or RB won’t let you down as often as the
top WR might. I decided to test this out to determine if the
consistency of players at specific positions can affect your overall
draft strategy.
The first step to this analysis is to find out
which position is more consistent than others. In order to determine
this, I copied the statistics of the top 16 quarterbacks, top 40
running backs, top 55 wide receivers as well as the top 16 tight
ends, kickers and defenses from 2005 to 2008 into a spreadsheet. I
obtained all those statistics from one of my leagues on
MFL. Afterwards, I calculated the standard deviation of each
player’s fantasy points for weeks one to sixteen (I never use week
seventeen in my calculations since many players are resting for the
playoffs). One of the problems with standard deviation is that
players with higher average scoring will have a higher standard
deviation. For that reason I used the coefficient of variation which
is equal to the standard deviation of the player’s fantasy points
divided by his average points per week. All you really need to
understand is that the lower the number, the more consistent the
player is but if you would like to know more you can look
here. After this, I took the average of these coefficients by
position over four years and compiled them in the following chart:
|
|
AVG |
2008 |
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
|
QB |
0.398 |
0.378 |
0.399 |
0.440 |
0.375 |
|
RB |
0.565 |
0.567 |
0.579 |
0.536 |
0.578 |
|
WR |
0.608 |
0.591 |
0.588 |
0.622 |
0.630 |
|
TE |
0.655 |
0.704 |
0.638 |
0.631 |
0.647 |
|
PK |
0.509 |
0.459 |
0.553 |
0.513 |
0.511 |
|
Def |
0.582 |
0.586 |
0.599 |
0.566 |
0.577 |
As I had previously believed, quarterbacks are much more consistent
than the other positions while wide receivers and tight ends are the
most inconsistent. In theory this should increase the value of
quarterbacks over wide receivers and tight ends since come playoff
time, your top QB is less likely to let you down that your top WR
is. For example, imagine the season lasts only three weeks and one
player has 10 points in all three weeks while the other has 5 points
for two of the weeks and 20 points in the third week. In a head to
head league, the consistent player would be better than the
inconsistent for two of the three weeks. However, I decided to test
this and find out if this was also true for a starting lineup of
nine players.
|