Top
Quarterback or Quarterback Tandem
(page 2)
One advantage of having two QBs in the 13 to 16 range is that you
will have a better backup when your starter is on his bye week. The
QBs drafted in this range average 240 fantasy points while QBs
drafted in the 19 to 24 range average only 182. This means that if
you choose to draft two QBs in that range, your backup QB will
average 58 more points than if you had a top QB and a below average
backup. 56 more points is an average of 3.5 more points per week so
the 27 points difference now becomes only 24 (or 31) since you will
have to start that backup during your starter’s bye week.
The calculations made above assume that between your starter and
your backup you will have started the QB who will have the most
points at the end of the season in all weeks except his bye week.
There is however one additional advantage of having two good QBs
which is that you can adjust for matchups and start the one which
you believe has the most favorable matchup every week.
We decided to look at weekly statistics from the last three years to
see which strategy would have been better if you started your QB
with the most points every week. Since there are injuries, we also
included an average QB you could have gotten off waivers and who
played all 16 games. For example, for 2008 we used Kerry Collins and
this makes sure the average for a top QB does not drop significantly
because of a serious injury, Tom Brady for example. Here is a table
which shows the total number of points you would have gotten from
your QBs using both strategies:
|
|
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
Average |
|
Top 3 QB and 19-24 QB |
343 |
375 |
302 |
340 |
|
2 QBs in the 13-16 range |
340 |
331 |
344 |
338 |
As you can see, since 2006 both strategies give you about the same
amount of points on average. Unfortunately we do not have statistics
to test this all the way back to 2003 but the averages from 2006 to
2008 are pretty similar than the ones from 2003 to 2005. Some might
argue that it is pretty unrealistic to assume you would be able to
pick the best QB every single week and they would have a point.
However, we said previously that the difference was 24 points
between the two strategies and now it is only two points. Even if
you don’t pick the best one every single week, that difference would
still drop to around 10 to 15 points depending on how often you are
correct. The reason it is an advantage to have two QBs of similar
talent is that you have a capable backup who can play when your
starter faces a tough passing defense. When you have a top starter
and a below average backup you will usually play your starter almost
every week unless the matchup is very unfavorable.
It is still early but at this point the QBs in the 13 to 16 range
are Carson Palmer, Matt Cassel, Eli Manning and Matt Hasselbeck.
Matt Schaub and David Garrard are also around that range, both of
whom are QBs that we believe could be undervalued this season. As
shown in the article above, you can expect to earn about 10 to 15
fewer points from a QB duo composed of two of those QBs than you
would with Brees, Manning or Brady and a weaker backup. That
difference might increase to about 15 to 20 points if you earn six
points per TD pass. The difference is that you might spend a ninth
round pick on Cassel and a tenth round pick on Garrard as opposed to
a second or third round pick on Brees, Manning or Brady. You could
select a WR like Reggie Wayne or Marques Colston in the second or
third round instead of a top QB and you would be at a slight
disadvantage at the QB position but would gain a large advantage at
the WR position.
For those who are involved in auctions, the advantage of this
strategy is even easier to demonstrate. Using suggested auction
prices from Ask The Commish which you can find
here,
Brees, Manning and Brady are worth respectively $20, $18 and $17
while QBs in the 13 to 16 range are worth between $4 and $6. Include
a backup QB at $1 and the top QB strategy will cost you about $19 on
average while the QB tandem will cost you only $10 out of your $100
budget. That is 10% of your budget that you are spending on a top
QB to earn less than one point per week on average.
A final advantage that you can gain from picking your QBs later is
that you have much more choice. Most websites have the top QBs
ranked in the same order and if, like last year, Brady is injured
and Manning does not have his best season you could be in trouble.
We believe it is much easier to find sleepers at the QB position
than at the RB or WR position. In our rankings last season, we had
Jay Cutler ranked 5th, David Garrard 6th, Matt Schaub 11th, Aaron
Rodgers 13th and Kurt Warner 14th, all five of those QBs had an
average draft position at least five spots lower than where we
ranked them. At the end of the year, four of the five finished in
the top ten and Matt Schaub probably would have made it had he not
missed five games. We might not be as lucky this season but even if
you pick any two QBs in the 13 to 16 range, you will gain an
advantage over your opponents.
|