Top
Quarterback or Quarterback Tandem?
One of the questions that many fantasy football players ask
themselves is when to draft their starting quarterback. Many sites
suggest waiting before drafting your starting QB because there is
generally good value in later rounds. In our
Average Draft Position Analysis Article
we came to the conclusion that the two groups that have value at QB
are the top three and the 13 to 16 group. However, the problem with
the 13 to 16 range is that there are some risky picks in that group
so this made us think: what if we selected two QBs in that 13 to 16
range to increase our chances of finding a big sleeper and reduce
the risk of being left without a starter? In the following article
we will compare the strategy of drafting a top QB with a below
average backup to the strategy of drafting two QBs in the 13 to 16
range.
For this analysis we used average draft position statistics since
2003. The first step is to look at how many total points your best
QB would have averaged in the past eight seasons had you always gone
with the strategy of drafting a top three QB and a below average
backup (19th to 24th best). There were 18 different possibilities in
each season (1 and 19, 1 and 20, 1 and 21 and so on…). The following
table shows the average number of points you could have expected
from your best starting QB in each season in a scoring system that
gives 1 point per 20 yards, 4 (or 6) pts per TD pass and deducts 1
pt for each INT:
|
|
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
Average |
|
4 pts per TD pass |
308 |
400 |
229 |
313 |
358 |
264 |
312 |
|
6 pts per TD pass |
356 |
480 |
267 |
368 |
430 |
309 |
368 |
The average points your best starting QB would have had is 312 (or
368) over the last six years which is not much of an increase over
the 305 (or 360) that the top three QBs drafted average since 2003.
The few additional points come from years in which one of the top
QBs disappointed and the QB you drafted to be your backup
outperformed him. We then did the same thing for the strategy of
drafting any two QBs in the 13 to 16 range in each season. There
were six possibilities in each season (13 and 14, 13 and 15, 13 and
16 and so on…). We have presented the yearly averages as well as the
average over six seasons in the following table:
|
|
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
Average |
|
4 pts per TD pass |
282 |
299 |
263 |
286 |
285 |
294 |
285 |
|
6 pts per TD pass |
329 |
351 |
311 |
328 |
338 |
343 |
333 |
As you can see the average over six seasons is 285 (or 333) points
which is 27 points behind the strategy of drafting a top QB and a
below average backup. More importantly, the average points for the
13th to 16th QBs drafted since 2003 is 239 (or 277) which means that
you increase the number of points you can expect from your starting
QB by 46 (or 56) points simply by drafting a good backup. At this
point it may seem that the top QB strategy is better but an
important element is that this season Drew Brees, Peyton Manning and
Tom Brady are likely to be drafted between the middle of the second
and middle of the third round while QBs 13 to 16 are being selected
in rounds nine and ten. This means that you are only giving up 27
points on average by selecting your QBs in the ninth and tenth round
as opposed to the second or third and twelfth or thirteenth round.
This seems like an interesting strategy but there are a few more
aspects that we need to consider before coming to a conclusion.
|