ADP Analysis - Wide Receivers
Wide receivers are starting
to get more and more respect on draft day and many owners are
drafting them in the second round instead of drafting their second
running back. In the past few years, many leagues have been shifting
towards a more WR friendly scoring system that gives one point for
every reception (PPR) and starting three WRs instead of two. Do
those changes really make WRs more valuable or are defenses simply
getting too good and are now able to stop any WR by focusing on him?
I have once again added another column in the chart to see the
difference between PPR and non-PPR leagues. For wide receivers, the
minimums used were 70 points for non-PPR and 110 for PPR:
|
POS |
ADP AVG |
PTS AVG (Non-PPR) |
PTS AVG (PPR) |
POS |
ADP AVG |
PTS AVG (Non-PPR) |
PTS AVG (PPR) |
|
1 |
11 |
165 |
240 |
29 |
82 |
104 |
160 |
|
2 |
14 |
171 |
248 |
30 |
84 |
106 |
164 |
|
3 |
17 |
180 |
264 |
31 |
89 |
96 |
146 |
|
4 |
20 |
156 |
231 |
32 |
92 |
122 |
170 |
|
5 |
23 |
183 |
274 |
33 |
93 |
110 |
162 |
|
6 |
25 |
158 |
243 |
34 |
96 |
105 |
169 |
|
7 |
27 |
139 |
213 |
35 |
100 |
83 |
131 |
|
8 |
29 |
149 |
232 |
36 |
105 |
112 |
168 |
|
9 |
32 |
115 |
180 |
37 |
110 |
110 |
168 |
|
10 |
34 |
145 |
223 |
38 |
113 |
74 |
115 |
|
11 |
36 |
125 |
189 |
39 |
117 |
100 |
153 |
|
12 |
37 |
137 |
213 |
40 |
121 |
131 |
187 |
|
13 |
39 |
142 |
215 |
41 |
123 |
114 |
169 |
|
14 |
42 |
146 |
221 |
42 |
126 |
143 |
221 |
|
15 |
45 |
145 |
214 |
43 |
128 |
110 |
164 |
|
16 |
47 |
134 |
208 |
44 |
132 |
104 |
158 |
|
17 |
49 |
137 |
205 |
45 |
136 |
100 |
144 |
|
18 |
52 |
144 |
217 |
46 |
139 |
101 |
157 |
|
19 |
56 |
126 |
198 |
47 |
141 |
88 |
134 |
|
20 |
58 |
112 |
173 |
48 |
144 |
106 |
160 |
|
21 |
60 |
117 |
179 |
49 |
147 |
99 |
148 |
|
22 |
63 |
107 |
162 |
50 |
150 |
103 |
153 |
|
23 |
65 |
118 |
178 |
51 |
152 |
98 |
155 |
|
24 |
68 |
123 |
188 |
52 |
155 |
83 |
133 |
|
25 |
71 |
137 |
206 |
53 |
160 |
84 |
132 |
|
26 |
74 |
92 |
137 |
54 |
164 |
99 |
151 |
|
27 |
76 |
142 |
209 |
55 |
166 |
74 |
111 |
|
28 |
80 |
139 |
203 |
56 |
168 |
91 |
142 |
|
POS |
ADP AVG |
PTS AVG (Non-PPR) |
PTS AVG (PPR) |
|
1 to 4 |
15 |
168 |
246 |
|
5 to 8 |
26 |
157 |
241 |
|
9 to 12 |
34 |
130 |
201 |
|
13 to 16 |
43 |
142 |
214 |
|
17 to 20 |
53 |
130 |
198 |
|
21 to 24 |
64 |
116 |
177 |
|
25 to 28 |
75 |
127 |
189 |
|
29 to 32 |
87 |
107 |
160 |
|
33 to 36 |
99 |
102 |
158 |
|
37 to 40 |
115 |
104 |
156 |
|
41 to 44 |
127 |
118 |
178 |
|
45 to 48 |
140 |
99 |
149 |
|
49 to 52 |
151 |
96 |
147 |
|
53 to 56 |
164 |
87 |
134 |
The first thing that
probably jumps out at you when you look at these charts is that
there is quite a difference between the top eight WRs and the rest.
There is also a noticeable drop after the top 28. The ideal strategy
would be to draft one of the top eight WRs and after that it does
not seem to matter too much where you draft your other ones as long
as you take your starters in the first six or seven rounds in a
12-team league. Here is another chart comparing two groups of WRs to
help prove my point:
|
POS |
ADP AVG |
PTS AVG |
PPR PTS AVG |
|
9 to 18 |
41 |
137 |
208 |
|
19 to 28 |
67 |
121 |
183 |
There is only a difference
of 16 points in a Non-PPR and 25 points in a PPR league for WRs who
were drafted on average more than two rounds apart. This means that
by drafting a WR in the fourth round instead of the sixth round you
can only expect on average 16 or 25 more points in a season. This
shows that there is probably a better strategy than drafting your
WRs in rounds three to five like many owners do. Let’s continue this
analysis by looking at the tight ends.
|