Rookie Wide Receivers
(page 2)
Another interesting thing I
noticed by looking at rookie wide receivers is that wide receivers
drafted early in the NFL Draft performed worse compared to their
average draft position than ones drafted later. Since 2000, there
have been 17 wide receivers drafted in the first 12 picks of the
first round and only two of them performed better than their average
draft position in fantasy drafts. The following table compares
rookie wide receivers drafted in the first 12 picks of the NFL Draft
with non-rookie wide receivers who ranked between 21st and 60th in
average draft position:
|
|
Average Draft
Position |
Average Rank |
% Improve |
|
Rookies (top 12 in NFL Draft) |
39.9 |
64.2 |
11.8% |
|
Non-Rookies (21 to 60) |
39.8 |
53.9 |
37.9% |
Even though the sample for
rookies is quite small, there is an obvious difference between these
two groups of players. This seems to indicate that rookie wide
receivers drafted in the first 12 picks of the NFL Draft are
generally very overrated by fantasy managers. My explanation for
this would be that wide receiver is a very complicated position and
those who adjust the quickest to the NFL game are not necessarily
the most talented. Moreover, the statistics of a wide receiver often
depend on the team they play for. Wide receivers drafted in the top
12 picks are usually on bad teams which is something that fantasy
managers may not take into account as much as they should. In the
past few years, Calvin Johnson, Braylon Edwards, Reggie Williams,
Troy Williamson, Ted Ginn, Darrius Heyward-Bey and Mike Williams are
all receivers who disappointed in their rookie season.
Now that I have shown that
rookie wide receivers drafted in the top 12 picks are overvalued,
let’s see how the statistics change for the group of wide receivers
that were not drafted in the top 12. The following table compares
the rookie wide receivers not drafted in the first 12 picks of the
NFL Draft with non-rookie wide receivers that ranked between 50th
and 85th in average draft position:
|
|
Average Draft
Position |
Average Rank |
% Improve |
|
Rookies (non top 12 in NFL Draft) |
67.8 |
72.7 |
50.8% |
|
Non-Rookies (50 to 85) |
67.7 |
74.4 |
47.9% |
As you can see, this data is
in favor of rookie wide receivers but the difference is only 2.9%.
The edge for rookie wide receivers also increases slightly if we
look at the ones drafted between the 13th pick and the end of the
second round. This is especially interesting if we consider that 7
of the 11 WRs drafted in that range in the past two years performed
better than their average draft position and three of them finished
in the top 30.
The data presented in this
article makes it quite evident that you should stay away from rookie
wide receivers drafted in the top 12 picks but you won’t have to
worry about this in 2010. Dez Bryant, Demaryius Thomas, Arrelious
Benn and Golden Tate are all rookie wide receivers that are worth
considering as they were drafted in the late first round or the
second round. However, you should also keep in mind that none of the
six receivers with an ADP in the top 35 performed better than their
ADP so you will probably want to stay away from Dez Bryant. We have
to admit that in past years we haven’t been very big on rookies but
based on this data, Thomas, Benn and Tate could be good picks in
2010.
|