ADP Analysis - Wide Receivers
Wide receivers are starting
to get more and more respect on draft day and many owners are
drafting them in the first or/and second round instead of drafting
their starting running backs. In the past few years, many leagues
have been shifting towards a more WR friendly scoring system that
gives one point for every reception (PPR) and starting three WRs
instead of two. I have once again added another column in the chart
to see the difference between PPR and non-PPR leagues. For wide
receivers, the minimums used were 70 points for non-PPR and 110 for
PPR:
|
POS |
ADP AVG |
PTS AVG (Non-PPR) |
PTS AVG (PPR) |
POS |
ADP AVG |
PTS AVG (Non-PPR) |
PTS AVG (PPR) |
|
1 |
11 |
167 |
248 |
29 |
82 |
105 |
161 |
|
2 |
14 |
173 |
248 |
30 |
85 |
108 |
167 |
|
3 |
17 |
166 |
246 |
31 |
89 |
105 |
159 |
|
4 |
20 |
157 |
232 |
32 |
91 |
120 |
172 |
|
5 |
21 |
198 |
296 |
33 |
93 |
119 |
171 |
|
6 |
24 |
154 |
234 |
34 |
97 |
112 |
178 |
|
7 |
26 |
164 |
253 |
35 |
101 |
90 |
141 |
|
8 |
28 |
126 |
200 |
36 |
105 |
96 |
149 |
|
9 |
31 |
115 |
187 |
37 |
110 |
109 |
165 |
|
10 |
32 |
170 |
256 |
38 |
115 |
82 |
126 |
|
11 |
35 |
122 |
194 |
39 |
119 |
88 |
139 |
|
12 |
36 |
148 |
220 |
40 |
123 |
131 |
190 |
|
13 |
38 |
143 |
213 |
41 |
126 |
102 |
157 |
|
14 |
40 |
135 |
208 |
42 |
129 |
113 |
182 |
|
15 |
43 |
139 |
204 |
43 |
135 |
152 |
230 |
|
16 |
45 |
140 |
213 |
44 |
138 |
81 |
127 |
|
17 |
47 |
162 |
235 |
45 |
142 |
85 |
127 |
|
18 |
51 |
109 |
168 |
46 |
148 |
95 |
144 |
|
19 |
55 |
145 |
221 |
47 |
150 |
82 |
128 |
|
20 |
58 |
142 |
219 |
48 |
153 |
90 |
138 |
|
21 |
60 |
102 |
157 |
49 |
157 |
97 |
149 |
|
22 |
62 |
124 |
189 |
50 |
159 |
87 |
136 |
|
23 |
64 |
105 |
160 |
51 |
163 |
107 |
165 |
|
24 |
67 |
115 |
177 |
52 |
165 |
83 |
134 |
|
25 |
70 |
166 |
250 |
53 |
169 |
92 |
142 |
|
26 |
73 |
86 |
129 |
54 |
172 |
86 |
131 |
|
27 |
75 |
120 |
179 |
55 |
174 |
79 |
121 |
|
28 |
78 |
133 |
200 |
56 |
177 |
92 |
147 |
|
POS |
ADP AVG |
PTS AVG (Non-PPR) |
PTS AVG (PPR) |
|
1 to 4 |
15 |
166 |
243 |
|
5 to 8 |
25 |
161 |
246 |
|
9 to 12 |
33 |
139 |
214 |
|
13 to 16 |
42 |
139 |
210 |
|
17 to 20 |
53 |
140 |
211 |
|
21 to 24 |
63 |
111 |
171 |
|
25 to 28 |
74 |
126 |
190 |
|
29 to 32 |
87 |
110 |
165 |
|
33 to 36 |
99 |
104 |
160 |
|
37 to 40 |
117 |
103 |
155 |
|
41 to 44 |
132 |
112 |
174 |
|
45 to 48 |
148 |
88 |
134 |
|
49 to 52 |
161 |
94 |
146 |
|
53 to 56 |
173 |
87 |
136 |
The first thing that
probably jumps out at you when you look at these charts is that
there is quite a difference between the top seven WRs and the rest.
There are also noticeable drops after the top 25 and also top 43.
The ideal strategy would be to draft one of the top seven WRs and
after that it does not seem to matter too much where you draft your
other ones as long as you take your starters in the first six or
seven rounds in a 12-team league. Here is another chart comparing
two groups of WRs to help prove my point:
|
POS |
ADP AVG |
PTS AVG |
PPR PTS AVG |
|
8 to 16 |
36 |
138 |
211 |
|
17 to 25 |
59 |
130 |
197 |
There is only a difference of 8 points in a Non-PPR and 14 points in
a PPR league for WRs who were drafted on average about two rounds
apart. This means that by drafting a WR in the third or fourth round
instead of the fifth or sixth round you can only expect on average 8
or 14 more points in a season. This shows that there is probably a
better strategy than drafting your WRs in rounds three or four like
many owners do. Let’s continue this analysis by looking at the tight
ends.
|